Addresses PR review: the containing block for an absolutely-positioned child
is the **padding box** (inside the borders), not the "border-box". Verified by
running yoga (an abs child at top:0/left:0 insets by the border only, never by
padding — confirmed across border/padding combos) and the real Ink/vue-tui
renderers (X lands at the inner-border edge, byte-identical in both).
- Tighten the regression test: exact-frame assertions instead of `toContain`,
including a border+padding case that distinguishes the padding box from the
content box — the assertion that would have caught the original wording slip
(presence-only assertions could not).
- Correct "containing block (border-box)" -> "padding box (inside the borders)"
in paint.ts, layout-guards.ts, and ink-divergences.md. (The unrelated
"border-box-like" *sizing* notes are correct and left as-is.)
No runtime behavior change; the code already used yoga's computed position.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Yunfei He
1bd91dbbb9